๐Œ๐š๐ง๐๐š๐ญ๐จ๐ซ๐ฒ ๐‘๐ž๐ญ๐ข๐ซ๐ž๐ฆ๐ž๐ง๐ญ ๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐”๐ง๐ฌ๐ฎ๐›๐ฌ๐ญ๐š๐ง๐ญ๐ข๐š๐ญ๐ž๐ ‘๐”๐ง๐ฉ๐ข๐œ๐ค๐ข๐ง๐ ’ ๐€๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ž๐ ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง

This post is a slightly edited compilation of a series of posts I originally wrote for a forum on the synoptic problem and posted on August 30, 2020. PART 1 I have just finished reading Alan Garrow‘s paper โ€œPlausibility, Probability and Synoptic Hypotheses: A Response to F. Gerald Downingโ€ ETL 26.1 (2020), 131-137, which heContinue reading “๐Œ๐š๐ง๐๐š๐ญ๐จ๐ซ๐ฒ ๐‘๐ž๐ญ๐ข๐ซ๐ž๐ฆ๐ž๐ง๐ญ ๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐”๐ง๐ฌ๐ฎ๐›๐ฌ๐ญ๐š๐ง๐ญ๐ข๐š๐ญ๐ž๐ ‘๐”๐ง๐ฉ๐ข๐œ๐ค๐ข๐ง๐ ’ ๐€๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ž๐ ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง”

The Crucial Issue of Verbatim Agreement? A Response to Robert MacEwen

Why Not Matthew’s Use Of Luke? This post is a long-delayed response Robert MacEwenโ€™s blog post responding to Mark Goodacreโ€™s paper โ€œWhy not Matthewโ€™s Use of Luke?โ€ (presented at SBL in 2018). MacEwen is defending the Matthean Posteriority Hypothesis (the gospels were written in the order Mark, Luke, Matthew with each evangelist using the workContinue reading “The Crucial Issue of Verbatim Agreement? A Response to Robert MacEwen”

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started